Thread: ruling
View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-08-2006, 04:16 PM
aaa aaa is offline
Member
is a major contributor here at GTO, and is a valued member...
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 212
aaa has an average reputation 5/10
Re: ruling

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregJWillis
No relief. Sorry.

If this was a rule, you could say that an aligator is swimming in the pond you just hit into and you cannot look for it becase of the danger and get relief?!?

No.
Decision 1-4/10

Q. A player’s ball comes to rest in a situation dangerous to the player, e.g., near a live rattlesnake or a bees’ nest. Does the player have any options in addition to playing the ball as it lies or, if applicable, proceeding under Rule 26 or 28?

A. Yes. It is unreasonable to expect the player to play from such a dangerous situation and unfair to require the player to incur a penalty under Rule 26 (Water Hazards) or Rule 28 (Ball Unplayable).
In equity (Rule 1-4), as an additional option the player should be permitted, without penalty, to drop a ball on the nearest spot not nearer the hole which is not dangerous.
If the ball lay in a hazard, it should be dropped, if possible, in the same hazard and, if not, in a similar nearby hazard, but in either case not nearer the hole. If it is not possible for the player to drop the ball in a hazard, he may drop it, under penalty of one stroke, outside the hazard, keeping the point where the original ball lay between the hole and the spot on which the ball is dropped.
If it is clearly unreasonable for the player to play a stroke because of interference by anything other than the dangerous situation he may not take relief as prescribed above, but he is not precluded from proceeding under Rule 26 or 28.
Reply With Quote