ML

Obviously pleased that Leslie King has worked for you because I hope it works for me as well but - and perhaps I am feeling sensitive this morning or something - was there any need for the patronising tone?

I wasn't trying to pick out the most important aspects of King's teaching method but to suggest where it might differ from much modern orthodoxy - I doubt, for example that anyone could seriously disagree that

THE GOLF SWING IS A MOVEMENT WHICH CAUSES THE CLUB-HEAD TO SWING INTO AND ALONG THE INTENDED LINE OF FLIGHT THROUGH THE IMPACT AREA AND BEYOND....WITH THE FACE OF THE CLUB SQUARE TO THAT LINE.

However his views on the body creating power and the one piece takeaway are different to much that is taught today and that was the debate I thought I was starting.