Originally Posted by bulldog2k

Clearly one decision is enough if it covers all eventualities but to me, the decision quoted doesn't.



This accounts for the situation of the different lie, but nothing else. If I'm 60 yards out, so use a SW to determine my point of nearest relief, drop, and end up with a perfect lie, how do I then claim that the lie of the ball now makes it expedient to use my driver, and hence use that for the measuring?