View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-05-2006, 04:41 PM
LowPost42's Avatar
My location
LowPost42 LowPost42 is offline
GTO Moderator
is a major contributor here at GTO, and is a valued member...
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,771
LowPost42 Has an unbeatable reputationLowPost42 Has an unbeatable reputation
Send a message via Yahoo to LowPost42
Re: Blades vs Cavity Backs

And now for the follow up.

Cavity backs offer the least distance lost on off-center hits. This is also known as maximum forgiveness. Everybody should play them. And I do mean everybody.

Muscle-cavity clubs are 2nd in the realm of forgiveness. The reason to play them is if you strike the ball better than average. You'll get a little more distance, as there is more weight behind the sweet spot. The tradeoff is when you do mis-hit, you'll lose more distance than with a cavity back. Still, more forgiving than either blades or musclebacks.

Blades have been known as 'players' clubs for the longest time. I'm not sure why, but I'll assume it has something to do with the stigma of 'game improvement clubs' when cavity back and muscle-cav irons first came out. The guys on Tour wouldn't be caught dead with them. Only marginally more forgiving than muscle backs.

Musclebacks are the ultimate thing to hit when you nut them. Sweet feeling, long, any positive adjective will do. But if you mishit them, you know it, RIGHT AWAY. IMO, Muscleback clubs are an ego thing. If they were really the bees knees, everyone on Tour would play them (having been around for a while). Instead, we've got guys on Tour playing cavity back irons, and hybrid clubs.
__________________
True Length Technology Fitter - www.truelengthtechnology.com
It's live! - www.ShipShapeClubs.com
PCS Class 'A' Clubfitter

A new highlight: Golfing the home course on Christmas Day.

I say it too often: If it's golf club shaped, you can play with it.

For the record, I'm a club doctor, not a swing doctor.
Reply With Quote