| Home | Forum | Tips | Gallery | Blog | Reviews | Lessons | Gym | Staff | Podcast |
| Register | FAQ | Links | Events | Arcade | Mark Forums Read |
| Our golf forum has 72,575 discussions | 35,127 members | 30 online now | rgjusa has just joined the GTO golf forum |
| ||||||||
| Welcome to golftuitiononline.com | the global golf forum You are currently viewing our golf forum as a guest which gives you limited access to the many features available here at the GTO golf forum. We are one of the largest golf forums online with 35,127 members worlwide and we pride ourselves on being the friendliest golf forum online. JOIN NOW (It's FREE) and you will gain immediate access to all these great features:
|
Register Now for FREE! |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
| New fitting idea **open discussion** I've recently re-considered a fitting theory that I abandoned after inquiring about it and was more or less shot down. But I managed to find a guy who not only has looked into the method, but uses it with 100% success (ie no returned sets built to this standard). He says that he can't sell a standard built iron set anymore. Here's the premise (based largely off the 1irongolf.com theory): You have an ideal athletic position. Think of any athlete standing in a static position, as they anticipate requiring dynamic movement. Volleyball players. Baseball players. Middle linebackers in American Football. They all stand the same was as the ideal golf posture - feet shoulder width apart, weight centered (or slightly forward of center), spine angled forward. We know in the golf swing the ideal spine angle is around 33° (adjust for your plane as necessary). Now, in a conventional iron set, you get progressively more bent over. Don't believe me? Stand in front of a full length mirror. Hold your longest iron/hybrid. Get a friend (or the mrs) to use a dry erase marker (or a piece of tape, or lipstick, or whatever) to mark the top of your head. Grab your PW. Now where's your head? What? Below that line? That's what I said would happen. So now, which is it? Is that 4 iron (or 3 or whatever) put you in your most athletic position? Or was it the PW? Or was it some club in between? I hit some test clubs, built on this theory. Every one was fantastic. Great trajectory, consistent ball flight, felt the head just fine... needless to say, I'm re-engineering my whole set. Then every club will be a favourite club. (Oddly enough, my 8 iron was already in spec - no wonder I always hit it well).
__________________ True Length Technology Fitter - www.truelengthtechnology.com It's live! - www.ShipShapeClubs.com PCS Class 'A' Clubfitter A new highlight: Golfing the home course on Christmas Day. I say it too often: If it's golf club shaped, you can play with it. For the record, I'm a club doctor, not a swing doctor. |
| ||||
| Re: New fitting idea **open discussion** Quote:
For SW, I think you could reduce the headweight slope. Apparently PureFit sells heads designed for single-length irons - so this may be the solution to this problem. Shaft tipping is another consideration. I'm not sure what kind of tipping would be required here - again, largely based on head weight I would figure. Theoretically, lie angles would all be the same in the ideal set. However, the reason I first started on this fitting line was because I didn't have a bending machine, and didn't want to pay $10/club to experiment. So my original thought was to tip the shafts, put them in the heads, get into the optimum golf stance, then mark where the shaft ends with the toe up (to get a quarter under it). This was my first theory before the complicating factors of swingweight, flex progression. I didn't think that shaft length was all that important - especially as when you figure that at a proper impact position, the centrifugal axis is your shoulder, not the end of the club. The straight line from the head runs up the shaft and up your arm (unless you're flipping or holding the club off at impact). So I concluded that the half inch step didn't mean much. The other interesting point is that if all the club lengths are the same, then the lies (set at the factory, in increasingly upright lies) will get more upright - forcing you to be more upright. So now we're back to equalizing the lies for clubs of the same length. Everyone's thoughts are welcome on the subject.
__________________ True Length Technology Fitter - www.truelengthtechnology.com It's live! - www.ShipShapeClubs.com PCS Class 'A' Clubfitter A new highlight: Golfing the home course on Christmas Day. I say it too often: If it's golf club shaped, you can play with it. For the record, I'm a club doctor, not a swing doctor. |
| |||
| Re: New fitting idea **open discussion** The other interesting point is that if all the club lengths are the same, then the lies (set at the factory, in increasingly upright lies) will get more upright - forcing you to be more upright. So now we're back to equalizing the lies for clubs of the same length. Everyone's thoughts are welcome on the subject.[/quote] Wouldn't this also change the flight of the ball? I have read some golfers (Darren Clarke being one) like to have more upright long irons and flatter short irons because it is easier to draw an upright iron and fade a flatter iron. Also would not having every iron the same length also make your yardages closer together and not give you the seperation you need between clubs? I always thought that was one of the reasons that clubs become shorter to slow down the swing speed as well as promoting more of an steep swing. Though it is not like I know much in this area, so if it works great. Though I would like to hear the results. |
| ||||
| Re: New fitting idea **open discussion** |
| ||||
| Re: New fitting idea **open discussion** This actually makes a lot of sense. I have a spare set of heads that I may start experimenting with. The only thing bothering me would be the lie angle of the set because, as you say, the long irons are more upright than the short irons. I'll build and weight match a 6, 7 and 8 iron using shafts of the same length and take them to my practice area then report back on my distance differentials (currently 12 yards between clubs +/- 1 yard). |
| ||||
| Re: New fitting idea **open discussion** hi xix think you got it wrong way round. short irons are more upright than long irons. i see you use smt durometer wedges, lowpost told me abouth them and have talked wife in to getting me them for my xmas, what do you think of them, i trust lowposts opinion and i know he knows his stuff about smt. bill Last edited by bill reed; 09-26-2006 at 08:06 PM. |
| ||||
| Re: New fitting idea **open discussion** Quote:
.As for the durometers, they are the best wedges I've ever had bar none, and I've tried all kinds of wedges. I've built a load of these up for friends after they watched me spin my ball back from one side of a green straight off the other side (intentionally I might add). They impart some serious spin on the ball but are very easy to control. I have the green insert models and won't be changing them in the forseeable future You won't be disappointed with them.
__________________ Ping Hoofer 2 SMT O2 9 degree Callaway Steelhead+ 5 Wood John Letters Tu 22 degree Rescue Wood SMT 303 CB2 4 to PW Dynamic Gold R300 spined. SMT Durometer Green 51* ,55* ,59* Wedges White Hot 2 Ball Putter Titleist ProV1 |
| ||||
| Re: New fitting idea **open discussion** bill go for the wedges mate i got a 53 and 59deg on the strength of lowposts recommendation and they feel superb and gained a lot more control over short game! |
| ||||
| Re: New fitting idea **open discussion** Quote:
Now, shaft length is NOT the #1 determiner of distance. Loft is. It's why your 5 iron is longer than your 9 iron, not the 2" difference. Increased shaft length = more yardage only if you can maintain sweetspot contact. In other words, you wouldn't necessarily hit a 40" 5 iron any further than a 37" 5 iron. However, I have read reports of bigger yardage gaps in the shorter irons, as they're longer than 'normal'. I'm still struggling to understand the need for a steeper swing, beyond 'because the lies are more upright, you need to bend over more'.
__________________ True Length Technology Fitter - www.truelengthtechnology.com It's live! - www.ShipShapeClubs.com PCS Class 'A' Clubfitter A new highlight: Golfing the home course on Christmas Day. I say it too often: If it's golf club shaped, you can play with it. For the record, I'm a club doctor, not a swing doctor. |
| ||||
| Re: New fitting idea **open discussion** |
| ||||
| Re: New fitting idea **open discussion** Quote:
|
| ||||
| Re: New fitting idea **open discussion** I got my irons and my driver from e bay. I'm now biding my time until I see some Avocet rescue woods for sale then I can replace my 5 and 7 woods and have a bag full of SMT gear (except for my much loved, trusty White Hot 2 ball putter which I'll never replace). |
| |||
| Re: New fitting idea **open discussion** Quote:
Irons This mix-and-match set was the first combo set TaylorMade put together on tour. The 3- through 6-iron are rac Combo cavity-backs, and the 7-iron through pitching wedge are rac MB. The shafts are Royal Precision Rifle High steel, 7.5. My long irons are bent 3 degrees upright to help me draw the ball. My short irons are bent 1 degree flat to help me fade it. I have never experimented with upright or flat but it seems to me that it would be easier to come from the inside on a more upright club. |