| Home | Forum | Tips | Gallery | Blog | Reviews | Lessons | Gym | Staff | Podcast |
| Register | FAQ | Links | Events | Arcade | Mark Forums Read |
| Our golf forum has 71,756 discussions | 33,942 members | 30 online now | beniuviafebab has just joined the GTO golf forum |
| ||||||||
| Welcome to golftuitiononline.com | the global golf forum You are currently viewing our golf forum as a guest which gives you limited access to the many features available here at the GTO golf forum. We are one of the largest golf forums online with 33,942 members worlwide and we pride ourselves on being the friendliest golf forum online. JOIN NOW (It's FREE) and you will gain immediate access to all these great features:
|
Register Now for FREE! |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| blades vrs cast, steel shafts vrs graphite? given any width on the course from a straight line, are either of the two options more acturate than the other? or is it all in the player? i raised this as a pro shop person told me graphite shafts are much more acturate, "thats why they are so expensive"? believe it or not. if so, does the same argument involve blades vrs cast irons? as an example, i use to wind surf, when started i was sold very large boards, withine a month i out grew them and moved on to smaller faster, more unstable boards, but once you could control them they were outstanding. eventually my garage filled up with five sets of boards. in retrospect, i feel i could have skipped some of the boards and gone straight to the final one with the same results, it would have ment more physcial effort and conscientration, but i would have save thousands of dollars. thanks pat |