Quote:
|
Originally Posted by elefsis When I hear the american commentators saying that he is in the rough and needing a three iron with 220 yards to go, I just have to laugh, as it is possible to see all the ball and if it was proper rough, like say for example at Princes G.C. on the Kent coast it is strictly recovery time, assuming the ball has been found. |
I realize that this thread is now...in the rough, but I have to agree with this. On many courses, the so-called "rough" should be called "soft fairway." I believe the sport would be improved by having the standards of the US Open applied more generally, so that lack of accuracy is punished more severely. And this would counteract the tendency, which many lament, that pro golf has become all about hitting monstrously long balls. If hitting fairways gave a substantial advantage (which it doesn't if the "rough" is entirely forgiving), accuracy would be the cardinal virtue. In the US at the current time there is only a weak correlation between hitting fairways and scoring, and that tells the whole story.