| Home | Forum | Tips | Gallery | Blog | Reviews | Lessons | Gym | Staff | Podcast |
| Register | FAQ | Links | Events | Arcade | Mark Forums Read |
| Our golf forum has 72,593 discussions | 35,188 members | 20 online now | Nupsstosy has just joined the GTO golf forum |
| ||||||||
| Welcome to golftuitiononline.com | the global golf forum You are currently viewing our golf forum as a guest which gives you limited access to the many features available here at the GTO golf forum. We are one of the largest golf forums online with 35,188 members worlwide and we pride ourselves on being the friendliest golf forum online. JOIN NOW (It's FREE) and you will gain immediate access to all these great features:
|
Register Now for FREE! |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
| shooting under par Quote:
people tell me i shouldn't "obsess" about my driving distance. but the reason i do is "all of the above"..... if i can't avg drive 280 then i keep practicing utill i can (i have before so i know it is a posability) not that driving distance is the key to winning, but if somone drives 250 and the other drives 280 and they have 250 left on hole i have 280 well if they can probly 3w onto green 250 and they are good, if i cna nly drive 250 then my 3w is porbly about 220 so that leaves me 30yds still to pithc, then to putt that is 3 strokes for me to get on the green, where he has only 2 so he is already one up on me. so you have an outstanding short game to even try to compete and hope his short game sucks..... and on a par 3 if it is 205 he is hitting a 5i, and i am hitting a 2i and i suck at hitting a 2i so that makes me hitting a 5w or a weak 3w which is alot harder to place then a 5i. having a short drive means all your clubs are short. and with par 3's and 5's being the distance they are i think 280 drive and a 200 5i is the distance is a must if you want to play scratch. what do you guys think is the min distances for the 5i and driver to play scratch? |
| ||||
| Re: shooting under par Quote:
Quote:
|
| |||
| Re: shooting under par It really depends on the length and difficulty of the course and type of course. My guesses are, for a typical PGA tour course playing around 69-7100 yds, I would say 270 for drives (about Fred Funk length) and 185 to 190 for a five iron. For the seniors, averaging around 65-6600 yds, probably about 260 minimum and 180-185 five iron, for the LPGA averaging around 63-6400, around 250 drive and 175 to 180 five iron. My guess is the average publice golf course on a weekend is set up to about 63-6400 yds from the white tees and 65-6600 yds from the back tees. |
| |||
| Re: shooting under par Yeah but take today as an example, woods was outdriving shaun macheel by 30 yards if not more and macheel beat him 4&3! I know a man called colin bradley at my club who drives it about 220-230 yards and he plays to scratch quite often he is about 75 years old. YOU DO NOT NEED DISTANCE TO PLAY TO SCRATCH! Anyone who has arms and legs and has a decent level of talent and skill can drive it 240 yards with todays technoligy, its just they cant be arsed to practice there short game! The amount of times people say practice there short game is unbelievable but STILL people say I CANT PLAY TO SCRATCH COS I ONLY DRIVE IT 250! Luke Donald hits his driver 275 and 5 iron about 195 and he doesent just play to scratch he probbaly plays to a +6 handicap!!! A scratch golfer at my club hits his driver around 260 average and hits his 5 iron around 180 and he holds the course record -4! Last edited by rharris06; 09-14-2006 at 06:20 PM. |
| |||
| Re: shooting under par Again, you cannot separate driving distance and score from slope and length. It is unlikely somebody who hits the ball 220-230 can consistently score in the low 70's on a 7000 yd course with a high slope, no matter how good their short game. |
| |||
| Re: shooting under par I was exaggerating, but you get my point. Even 6600 yds would be difficult, not impossible, but difficult to shoot scratch on with a driving distance of 230. Adding to that, if the greens are slopped, they are hard to hold with clubs longer than a 7 iron. |
| |||
| Re: shooting under par Quote:
He has realized his game is what it is that he is not going to be driving it with the Gore's and Daly's that to beat them he needs not only to find the fairway more often but the proper part of the fairway. How many of us on this site in the above hypothetical would still fire at the pin with a 5 iron or even consider where you wanted to miss the green ? So I think that not only do they have a great short game they also realize that certain areas are easier to get the ball up and down then others. But ones total score is still combination of how well a golfer does certain things and by playing to your strengths and away from your strengths. Take Donald he is not one of the longer hitters on tour but I think that he also conpensates for that by being one of the best long iron hitters on tour. It is definately easier to make par by playing driver wedge, then driver 4 iron. |
| ||||
| Re: shooting under par hi ogallalabob dave the pro i played with did the same he had spots on the fairway where he knew the best shot in with the diffrent flag placements, and he thought it a bad shot if he was more the 15 feet away, he also knew the greens like the back of his hand and he was a great help at showing you the lines of your putts to, he had good parts on green where he allway hit if it was real windy as he knew he would two putt and had a chance at a one put. bill |
| |||
| Re: shooting under par Because lately I havent been hitting my driver well i have been hitting alot of 3 irons and 3 woods off the tee! and with these clubs I can actually look at a spot in the fairway where i want to hit it which will give me the bestest angle into the hole placement! I never really use to do this because once i driver is in my hand im like 90% of youngsters these days, grip it and rip it but it isnt what you really the best way to play!! Coursemanagement, Short game and mental game are the 3 most important parts of this game for sure! |
| |||
| Re: shooting under par Quote:
I should be hitting it farther then 230, right ricky ![]() |
| ||||
| Re: shooting under par Quote:
|