| Home | Forum | Tips | Gallery | Blog | Reviews | Lessons | Gym | Staff | Podcast |
| Register | FAQ | Links | Events | Arcade | Mark Forums Read |
| Our golf forum has 71,761 discussions | 33,959 members | 22 online now | GoaliaPrearse has just joined the GTO golf forum |
| ||||||||
| Welcome to golftuitiononline.com | the global golf forum You are currently viewing our golf forum as a guest which gives you limited access to the many features available here at the GTO golf forum. We are one of the largest golf forums online with 33,959 members worlwide and we pride ourselves on being the friendliest golf forum online. JOIN NOW (It's FREE) and you will gain immediate access to all these great features:
|
Register Now for FREE! |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| 52%,56% or 60% wedge? I've been playing golf a long time, to be honest without much thought. I play around my local course at around 10 -15 over par.This year my main aim is to improve my short game because that is where the scoring is.I just have a standard set of clubs with a PW and a SW.1. Does anyone know the average loft of the PW and SW. 2. What one club do you think would help me most ie. 52%,56% or 60%. 3. Any suggestions for best value for money wedge product ie.good feel and something not too hard to check the ball to a stop quickly on the greens? Any help would be much appreciated ![]() |
| ||||
| Re: 52%,56% or 60% wedge? Quote:
Quote:
You should always try to get an evenly distributed set, i.e a set 48*, 54*, 60* (6 degrees diff) or 50*, 54*, 58* (4 degrees diff) would also work fine. Quote:
![]() Personally, I play a set of 48*, 52* (bent 51*), 56* and 60*. The PW is part of my Titleist iron set and the 3 other wedges are 588's. |
| ||||
| Re: 52%,56% or 60% wedge? I agree with Peter wholeheartedly (except on the wedge recommendation!) Vokeys are popular, but I prefer SMT Durometers. CNC Milled faces add even more spin, for more stopping power. |
| ||||
| Re: 52%,56% or 60% wedge? I often hesitate to mention component heads/clubs when talking to folks across the pond. I've been lead to believe that components (SMT, Bang, Alpha, Geek, Ashton, etc) aren't as widely available as they are here, and that they end up being marginally cheaper than OEMs. Now, that said, I still think that components are superior to mass-produced OEMs on three fronts. One being that you get 'more head for the money', as most components don't have huge advertising budgets, and don't pay tour players to play their gear. The second front is that if you find a good clubfitter/clubmaker, your clubs will automatically play better for you (as they'll be fitted to you - which off the rack clubs may rarely ever do). The third front is that components are often built with tighter tolerances - no more six and seven irons going the same distance! For the ultimate in tight tolerances, check out the yet-to-be-released (but in production) Ashton E3.
__________________ True Length Technology Fitter - www.truelengthtechnology.com It's live! - www.ShipShapeClubs.com PCS Class 'A' Clubfitter A new highlight: Golfing the home course on Christmas Day. I say it too often: If it's golf club shaped, you can play with it. For the record, I'm a club doctor, not a swing doctor. |
| ||||
| Re: 52%,56% or 60% wedge? Yep, components are rare, at least in Sweden. Ordering on-line might sometimes be cheaper, but with taxes and postage and the problems and costs with sending back items combined with the fact that you can't try anything out, most of us probably just buy the standard clubs from the stores. |
| ||||
| Re: 52%,56% or 60% wedge? Quote:
) and I always found chipping and pitching to be a lot easier than driving and long irons. |