Mizuno MP 32 vs MP 60?

I need some feedback in deciding between purchasing either the MP 32 or MP 60's. I shoot in the mid-low 80s. I could be better if my short game were better. I have always liked the look and feel of a blade. This year I have played a cavity back RAM FX5. To be honest it has improvemed my game considerably. My distance has increased significantly.

I depending on their availability I want to upgrade the quality of my clubs to a Mizuno. I have tried to hit the irons at the store into the screen. I do not have much feedback other than the computer simulation. As for feel they feel very similar. From my research on the clubs I felt I hit the 32's better than the more "forgiving" 60's.

The sales staff said for double digit handicaps to avoid blades and go to stay with a cavity.

Can anyone give me their thoughts on these clubs and the best way to evaluate what one to buy? or should I stick with the RAM's and save the money on a decent Driver or Hybrid or Wedge. Or consider a Titleist blade or Taylor Made blade which I can hit pure and straight but it does lack the softness of cavity back.

From my research both MP 32s and MP 60s sound amazing and have satisfied players.

Thanks for the help.

I use MP32's. I play of 6. in the golf magazines reviews MP 32 has been the top blade for the past year (or longer), it is described as "easier to hit than most blades, build to high standards". although I have learned to enjoy using mp32's I still find hitting "normal" clubs easier! more margine for error. blades are not as forgiving as the advertisers like us to believe however there is something about them that makes them MUST HAVE for me!
having said all this! you have to get the clubs that you enjoy and hit well, I was told that Lee Westwood plays with a set that he has had most his life. so forget which is better on paper and give them a bash.