| Home | Forum | Tips | Gallery | Blog | Reviews | Lessons | Gym | Staff | Podcast |
| Register | FAQ | Links | Events | Arcade | Mark Forums Read |
| Our golf forum has 69,657 discussions | 31,812 members | 51 online now | wbadamscopley has just joined the GTO golf forum |
| ||||||||
| Welcome to golftuitiononline.com | the global golf forum You are currently viewing our golf forum as a guest which gives you limited access to the many features available here at the GTO golf forum. We are one of the largest golf forums online with 31,812 members worlwide and we pride ourselves on being the friendliest golf forum online. JOIN NOW (It's FREE) and you will gain immediate access to all these great features:
|
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| Lateral hazard relief I lost a match in the club championship that hinged on the following ruling. My competitor hit his ball and landed within the red stakes of a lateral hazard. It rested on the edge of the cart path. This portion was within the hazard. The ruling was he got free relief from the cart path even though it was within the hazard. Was this correct? |
| ||||
| Re: Lateral hazard relief I would say he is right. Relief from the cart path is a local rule, which supercedes the Rules of Golf. |
| |||
| Re: Lateral hazard relief you was robbed! ![]() Note 1 to Rule 24-2 b. states "If a ball is in a hazard (including a lateral water hazard), the player may not take relief from interference by an immovable obstruction. The player must play the ball as it lies or proceed under Rule 26-1." Rule 26-1 pertains to water hazards and would require a penalty of one stroke be added for any relief taken. |
| ||||
| Re: Lateral hazard relief Here's a really simple answer: nope, he wasn't entitled to relief. Immovable obstructions do not count in hazards unless it is a local rule. He can't take relief from anything in a hazard unless it is in a local rule. Like: if he hit the golf ball onto a platform floated in a water hazard that a car was standing on. If relief was given in a local rule, he can drop n.p.o.r. otherwise he has to play it as it lies. Now, if n.p.o.r. was in the water, then he has to drop it in the water! One thing worries me: how the hell can they run a cart parth through an area marked with read stakes and not include that area as part of the hazard!? That is seriously bad of the Committee! Normally the Committee include bridges, paths, floats, etc. as being part of the hazard. Sorry that you were robbed! That is a pity. ![]()
__________________ Golf is easy ... once you know how. Graham Arnott, teaching professional Kelrosa Golf Studios www.kelrosagolf.com Class 'A' PGA Member Full Member: World Golf Teachers Federation (GB&I) |
| ||||
| Re: Lateral hazard relief Thanks Gord. I missed that part - I was looking in the appendix. I thought that since I usually see the cart path rule posted, I figured it got classes as local, overriding the Rules. Kind of like playing Winter Rules golf. |
| |||
| Re: Lateral hazard relief To Teaching Pro, Originally there was a red line about one foot to the left of the cart path along with red stakes. Due to rain and the fact that the line had not been painted in a while, there was no longer evidence of the red line between the stakes. Without the line, the only option was to go stake to stake. The path curved where is ball laid on the extreme left edge of the path. Going stake to stake he was about 3 feet inside the hazard line. The red line was evident after about 50 feet on either side of the ball. The rules committee first tried to say that the grounds keepers intention was to have the path outside of the hazard. However if there is no evidence of a hazard line there is no choice except going stake to stake. Intentions don't matter. To make a long story short, the rules committee said even if the ball was in the hazard he got free relief from the cart path. My pleas to consult the rule book were ignored and I was left in the fairway with my pleas falling on deaf ears as they left. I refused to sign the card. Losing that ruling cost me going to the first tee for a playoff. Bottom line, this is a semi private course, he is a paying member and I am a daily fee player. Guess who got screwed? |
| |||
| Re: Lateral hazard relief Quote:
You do not get relief from an obstruction in a hazard. This cannot be overriden by a Local Rule. A Local Rule cannot override a Rule of Golf. |
| ||||
| Re: Lateral hazard relief I don't see a rule providing an allowance for 'winter rules' or 'preferred lies' golf, yet I see it all the time, as a Local Rule. This local rule is then overriding the Rule of Golf stating that a golfer should take a stroke for moving a ball at rest. What does this fall under, aaa? I thought that the point of local rules was to augment the Official Rules? |
| |||
| Re: Lateral hazard relief Rule 33-8 Local Rules a. Policy The Committee may establish Local Rules for local abnormal conditions if they are consistent with the policy set forth in Appendix I. b. Waiving or Modifying a Rule A Rule of Golf must not be waived by a Local Rule. However, if a Committee considers that local abnormal conditions interfere with the proper playing of the game to the extent that it is necessary to make a Local Rule that modifies the Rules of Golf, the Local Rule must be authorised by the R&A. Appendix 1 Part A - Local Rules As provided in Rule 33-8a, the Committee may make and publish Local Rules for local abnormal conditions if they are consistent with the policy established in this Appendix. In addition, detailed information regarding acceptable and prohibited Local Rules is provided in "Decisions on the Rules of Golf" under Rule 33-8 and in "Guidance on Running a Competition". If local abnormal conditions interfere with the proper playing of the game and the Committee considers it necessary to modify a Rule of Golf, authorisation from the R&A must be obtained. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |