| Home | Forum | Tips | Gallery | Blog | Reviews | Lessons | Gym | Staff | Podcast |
| Register | FAQ | Links | Events | Arcade | Mark Forums Read |
| Our golf forum has 72,581 discussions | 35,132 members | 36 online now | AndrewPI has just joined the GTO golf forum |
| ||||||||
| Welcome to golftuitiononline.com | the global golf forum You are currently viewing our golf forum as a guest which gives you limited access to the many features available here at the GTO golf forum. We are one of the largest golf forums online with 35,132 members worlwide and we pride ourselves on being the friendliest golf forum online. JOIN NOW (It's FREE) and you will gain immediate access to all these great features:
|
Register Now for FREE! |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| Natural draw - is clubface square or slightly close at impact? Hi all, after 7 years playing, I'm finally starting to learn how to create a gentle draw. For those of you who have already this skill, I have a question: When coming through impact, assuming correct swing path, does a natural release of the clubhead take care of the draw? In other words, assuming that I am releasing the clubhead without problems, should I work on my swing path coming into the ball, and then the draw will automatically take place? The reason I ask is because I am wondering whether I should be working on both the path and clubhead release. At the moment, I'm getting all sorts of results, such as pushes and hooks, but I don't know whether I'm swinging too much from the inside or rolling the arms too quickly or a combination of the two. Does a natural draw come from the clubface being slightly closed at impact, or is it square and then starts to close from there as the clubhead returns back to the inside? Thanks |
| |||
| Re: Natural draw - is clubface square or slightly close at impact? Aahh...the last three holes of the US Open...lol...go Rocko |
| |||
| Re: Natural draw - is clubface square or slightly close at impact? Quote:
Thanks for the reply. It's what I wanted to hear, with the swing being complicated enough as it is. I can see from my down-the-line video that my clubhead is behind the plane line by about 4 inches half way down, which will explain my hooks and pushes. I am having to really emphasis the arms coming in more from the inside and holding my right shoulder back. I might get a hook or push, but if I get lazy and don't emphasis this, I then go out-to-in. I'd rather not think about it at all, but let it all happen. For this to happen, I guess the back swing needs to be in a good position for the arms to just drop down into the "slot" on the way down. I hear a lot of people advising to swing the left arm back in line with the target more so that it has enough room to drop inside. A recent lesson from a pro also said to swing as if I'm doing a half swing shot, and this will allow the clubhead to come down with plenty of room. However, all this feels as if the clubhead is way too outside the line and I fear coming over the top on the way down. Should I feel that I re-route the clubhead inside on the way down, or should the correct hip action automatically bring this inside to square to inside? |
| ||||
| Re: Natural draw - is clubface square or slightly close at impact? Quote:
Keep your posture all the way through the swing. I think a lot of OTT swings come from standing up during the downswing, so then the golfer starts to feel as though he reroutes the club inside (more behind him) to stop the OTT. In actual fact this puts the clubhead behind/under the hands, hence you get your particular shot pattern. Check it on your vid. Draw a line behind your butt. If there's a gap emerging during your downswing, you're losing posture. Whatever posture you start with, keep it til well after the ball's gone. Re the backswing, just keep your upper left arm connected to your left pec. Do'nt start swinging more down/outside the line with your arms in order to give yourself room to drop inside. You'd be half-solving one problem, but creating 10 more.
__________________ Luke: I don't believe it! Yoda: That is why you fail. |
| ||||
| Re: Natural draw - is clubface square or slightly close at impact? Quote:
hit into the wind without having to club-up four times, stop balooning shots, get penetration, keep it low, get it round that damn tree/clubhouse/lorry, hold it into the slope, draw it for brownie points, stop the left to right crosswind turning a fade into a huge slice, get to a pin tucked on the left from the left side of the fairway................... I know what you're getting at Bri! I'm just playin'! |
| ||||
| Re: Natural draw - is clubface square or slightly close at impact? Quote:
IMO a high handicap player would do better to keep away from complications like facing off target, manipulating the wrists, swinging in-to-out etc. I think Neil's comment on "draw it for brownie points" is more of an incentive in may cases. "KISS" should be the watchword for most players.
__________________ Best Regards Brian ________________________________ Funny o'l game! |
| ||||
| Re: Natural draw - is clubface square or slightly close at impact? Quote:
There is, however, a time and a place. "KISS"? Keep It Simple...........????....dunno what the other S is for! |
| ||||
| Re: Natural draw - is clubface square or slightly close at impact? Quote:
Yes Neil, there is a time and a place: crawl, stand, walk, run. |
| |||
| Re: Natural draw - is clubface square or slightly close at impact? Quote:
Thanks to Neil18 for advising not to think about the rolling of the wrists, but more of the swing path. I have also found that drawing the ball deliberatly, say around an obstacle, is much easier when the body is closed in relation to the clubhead. Previously, my OTT action would just be negated when trying for a draw, so an even bigger draw would have been impossible. My divots are much more shallower too, and I am able to keep the ball on the fairway/green more. So hitting a draw is the solution for me. Maybe not for everyone, but has stopped shots leaking out to the right, missing the green for a two (or one) putt. One last question - I've been using MP-32s and MP-33s for a very long while - are these clubs more sensitive to the swing path errors than say Callaway X-20s? In other words, assuming the same amount of release, if I deviated from a "normal" swing path into the ball with a Mizuno blade, would the result be far greater than a game improvement club? Thanks all |
| |||
| Re: Natural draw - is clubface square or slightly close at impact? A small draw is a good shot shape for learning a proper swing because it is consistent with the elements of a simple, efficient and fundamentally solid swing, that is, striking the ball at the outer point of the swing arc (before the club starts back in) with a basically square club face. Other shot shapes are useful on the course and frequently "better" for conditions or situations, or even as a good players "stock" shot, but they require deviation from what is inherently natural and efficient given the physics of the motion. |
| ||||
| Re: Natural draw - is clubface square or slightly close at impact? Sounds like you have sorted it. Well done. I was not suggesting that you should not hit a draw, I was more concerned that you were struggling with consistency and considering manipulations with your wrists and stance to fix them and that could have created more inconsistencies. I think you now understand that making good ball contact will produce the results you desire. |