| Home | Forum | Tips | Gallery | Blog | Reviews | Lessons | Gym | Staff | Podcast |
| Register | FAQ | Links | Events | Arcade | Mark Forums Read |
| Our golf forum has 71,774 discussions | 33,981 members | 22 online now | Vancup has just joined the GTO golf forum |
| ||||||||
| Welcome to golftuitiononline.com | the global golf forum You are currently viewing our golf forum as a guest which gives you limited access to the many features available here at the GTO golf forum. We are one of the largest golf forums online with 33,981 members worlwide and we pride ourselves on being the friendliest golf forum online. JOIN NOW (It's FREE) and you will gain immediate access to all these great features:
|
Register Now for FREE! |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| Re: Still teachin Austinology... Quote:
I'll have to dig up the DVD when I get home - I remember it being pretty well done. Thanks GB. |
| ||||
| Re: Still teachin Austinology... Quote:
GB, Thanks for taking time to explain, it is appreciated. There is plenty for me to ponder on. I am glad that you are feeling better. |
| ||||
| Re: Still teachin Austinology... Quote:
Last edited by jambalaya; 06-12-2008 at 01:52 PM. |
| ||||
| Re: Still teachin Austinology... So GG28, the Mike Austin thing has helped you to see the light? I too am trying to develop a more natural swing with the idea of throwing the club with the right hand as part of the process. My problem is I just can't consistently get posted up on that left leg to complete the forward turn and get maximum leverage in my swing. I'm making a little progress though. One thing I find happening when using the right arm or hand more is that it works really well at first then suddenly I lose my swing plane and have to go back to just thinking about keeping the club on plane. I can at least make decent contact just keeping the club on plane but there is still something missing. That certain pop in my swing is not there. I am thinking about looking at Mike Austin's DVD or perhaps the 3skills thing to see if I can find another breakthrough. Last edited by jambalaya; 06-13-2008 at 01:31 PM. |
| |||
| Re: Still teachin Austinology... New student to the Mike Austin swing and i definitely agree that the George H stuff is not very good. I have the Secrets of the Worlds Longest Hitter video and will stick with that as it seems simple and seems to work. |
| |||
| Quote:
PM sent |
| |||
| Re: Still teachin Austinology... I'm trying to learn a little about the Austin swing so I thought I'd throw my 2 cents worth in (and ask a couple of questions). I purchased: Mike & Mike's "Secrets" video, Dunaway's "World's Best Driver" video, Dunaway's "Hit it Hard" book, Shauger's "How to Kill the Ball" book. (As an aside, it is amazing what you can find on Amazon in the used section, I have less that $50 in the entire collection, and I've always believed you have to get information from multiple sources to get the whole story.) I'm not sure if Shauger is teaching a variation on Austin's swing, or is just emphasising things differently. There's not doubt though, if you followed Shauger's advice to the tee you would have a different swing than if the followed both Mike's advice to a tee (although to be fair, Dunaway also seems to emphasize things slightly differently in both videos.) Both books talk about a cranking motion, and the videos talk about throwing from the top. Shauger though, talks about rolling your left wrist counter-clockwise on the back swing, then turning your right wrist clockwise (like turning a doorknob) on the downswing. I Shauger just trying to emphasize that you don't want to use the rolling of the arms by emphasizing the opposite, or is this clockwise twisting motion part of the Austin swing that just isn't emphasized in the other material. The other thing I noticed is the books emphasize the hip shift & tilt and straightening of the posting leg (right on backswing, left on forswing), but when I watched the videos it seems like a much more subtle motion. Neither Dunaway or Austin lock their legs at anytime, and Austins hip sway and tilt seemed almost imperceptible in the video (even slowed down, although Dunaway seems to show more sway/tilt). However, the guy that appears in Shauger's book performing examples also appears on the extras fo the "Secrets" video, and as far as I can tell he does lock his leg and has a noticble hip sway/tilt. So which is it? should there be a big sway/tilt with the locking of legs or is this just exageratted in the teaching to get you out of the "bent knees, level hips, rotate around your spine" mindset? |
| |||
| Re: Still teachin Austinology... Quote:
you never want to Lock your legs, there is a difference in straitinging and locking. if you had to hold 200lbs over your head on one leg, would you lock it or just keep it strait? you would deffinatley not bend it. MA advocates in what appears to me to be a reverse pivot as some call it. Most current teachings tell you to always keep that spine tilt in the same direction through the swing. MA uses his lower spine like a pendulum and moved it back and forth. So at the top of his swing the back leg is straiting and forms a straight line he calls that his spine extended from his nick to his knee on the back foot and the front side pivots and shifts around that hinge like a gate. and on the DS his front legs stratiens and creates a hinge from which the rear leg can close around the post and slam into the ball. I am surprised you got all thoose videos and books on people saying "this is what MA taught me" instead of getting an actual MA video and seeing and hearing what MA actually taught. He is giving dunaway lessons and still dunaway will swing wrong and MA will so , "no, not like that, liek this". If the guy can't remember what MA taught his 5 mins ago how accurate can he be 20 some years? My advice, get the info strait from the horses mouth. |
| |||
| Re: Still teachin Austinology... Quote:
Your comment does bring up a good point I've noticed. The people surrounding this swing method remind me of a dysfunctional family. Bickering over who is teaching the true swing and who has the right to teach it and who doesn't. It sounds like a bunch of children arguing about which one daddy loved the most. It's a golf swing, not the formula to turn lead into gold. I've notice people can teach something in totally different ways, yet achieve the same results. That they emphasize different parts, or use different examples doesn't mean they are teaching it wrong. It only means they are using a different method to teach it. This is good, because students are different. A single type of teaching approach will not work with every student. I think it is important to get info form a variety of sources/teachers. What one teacher believes is obvious (so it doesn't even rate a mention) is often a point another teacher feels is obscure (and thus needs to be emphasized.) The bickering among the teachers of this method is doing them all harm. Potential students don't say "This guy is teaching the real swing, so I'll stay away from the other guys." They say "These guys are an arguing mess, I'm not sure which one has it right, so I'm just going to was my hands of the whole Austin swing thing." From a marketing perspective, if you want to popularize this swing (and make more money) the half dozen or so guys that have written about this method or present themselves as gurus should bury the hatchet, resolve their personal differences, and form something like "The Austin Swing Teachers Assoc." to help promote the swing method. If there are slight variations in the way different people teach the swing, that's OK. Even Austin taught the swing slightly differently as he got older. By presenting more of a united front (instead of the bickering one now presented), the swing will become more popular, and EVERYBODY will have more students and make more money. Last edited by HytrewQasdfg; 08-19-2008 at 03:24 PM. |