| Home | Forum | Tips | Gallery | Blog | Reviews | Lessons | Gym | Staff | Podcast |
| Register | FAQ | Links | Events | Arcade | Mark Forums Read |
| Our golf forum has 71,179 discussions | 32,648 members | 43 online now | jeffkh has just joined the GTO golf forum |
| ||||||||
| Welcome to golftuitiononline.com | the global golf forum You are currently viewing our golf forum as a guest which gives you limited access to the many features available here at the GTO golf forum. We are one of the largest golf forums online with 32,648 members worlwide and we pride ourselves on being the friendliest golf forum online. JOIN NOW (It's FREE) and you will gain immediate access to all these great features:
|
Register Now for FREE! |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
| Re: JB holmes he is in this months golf digest, it compares his swing to camilo villegas and bubba watson, he does have a short arse swing, he just has incredible arm speed, and good leverage my dad has a little less than 3/4 swing and he kills shots, but his forearms are like tree trunks |
| ||||
| Re: JB holmes yea, thanks, here is the link to that articel if anyone is interested http://www.golfdigest.com/instructio...06bombers.html |
| ||||
| Re: JB holmes Quote:
what is meant by leverage? is that the same as lag? |
| ||||
| Re: JB holmes yeah he squats and then springs up right before he hits yeah really strong forearms and fast hips i tried some of his swings earlier, good control for sure, low trajectory, looks like it would have good roll, would be good for hitting into the wind...only about 20 yards shy of my real swing |
| |||
| Re: JB holmes realize this, the most important factor in distance is club head speed when the ball leaves the club face. So while his backswing may be short he is actually accelerating through the ball, a large majority of players are decelerating |
| |||
| Re: JB holmes Quote:
|
| ||||
| Re: JB holmes that is true, all i am saying is that there is some formula out there that says speed = acceleration X distance.(i think that is right). and if you can properly acceralte then a longer backswing will go farther technically. but i know that a shorter backswing can help too. the reason short backswings can have power too is if you restrict your hip rotation and get a high x fatoc (angle relation of hip and shoulder turn) you get more power from a short backswing and long backswing usually are leated to letting the hips rotate alot more therefore allowing the shoulders to rotate more which increases you distance, but decreases you x factor. but if one were to swing as far back as daly ( it think tiger is the closest and most flexible) with little hip rotation giving them a big x facor then that longer backswing would result in more SS. now what i was referring too with holmes short backswing is that his shoulders turn looks good but it seems like he has no wrist cock at all. Last edited by lgskywalker37; 05-18-2006 at 04:57 PM. |
| |||
| Re: JB holmes If tiger swung back that far, with hip restriction, it would be his last swing, ever. There are advantages to a shorter back swing, you can accelerate at the ball as fast as you want, that is what I do, on a long backswing you can accelerate too fast and decelerate into the ball. If you remember when tiger started working with butch, he shortened his back swing but did not loose any distance. Daly has a gradual acceleration that very few people would be able to pull off. |
| ||||
| Re: JB holmes [quote=shootin4par]There are advantages to a shorter back swing, you can accelerate at the ball as fast as you want, that is what I do, on a long backswing you can accelerate too fast and decelerate into the ball. quote] oh, ok, that makes sense, thanks. but i thought that wrist cocking was important and i could be wrong, but it appears to me that JB has no wrist cock at all, i am wrong on that? |