| Home | Forum | Tips | Gallery | Blog | Reviews | Lessons | Gym | Staff | Podcast |
| Register | FAQ | Links | Events | Arcade | Mark Forums Read |
| Our golf forum has 69,244 discussions | 31,715 members | 44 online now | snafu has just joined the GTO golf forum |
| ||||||||
| Welcome to golftuitiononline.com | the global golf forum You are currently viewing our golf forum as a guest which gives you limited access to the many features available here at the GTO golf forum. We are one of the largest golf forums online with 31,715 members worlwide and we pride ourselves on being the friendliest golf forum online. JOIN NOW (It's FREE) and you will gain immediate access to all these great features:
|
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| Re: Mickelslam He is playing great but I do not see him winning both Opens. Though this 2 driver system if it continues to allow him to hit more fairways may help, because that is his one down fall in the past is that he only hits about 60% of the fairways and that is not ideal in either open. Augusta and the PGA you can get away with it more then the Opens. Plus I think that both Opens course set up and larger fields allows for more players to have a chance which make them the harder event to win. As far as Tiger he clearly did not look on his game. But when you only lose by 4 strokes at Augusta you can usually go back and find 5 strokes over the last 36 holes that were blown on those tricky greens. I know you can do that for Chad Cambell, Couples, Vijay and Clark. I am not sure about Retief. As much length of the course was talked about it really always comes down to a players ability to make the 4-8 foot puts to save par or to pick up a stroke on the field. Bob |
| |||
| I agree with Mizunoman, Tiger has too much violence in his swing and this, in my opinion is the cause of his wayward shots. Mickelson, on his own admission used the "draw"driver on holes that called for a fade, odd, dont you think? I dont think Tiger will enjoy the supremecy he enjoyed in the past, the young players have no fear of anyone. |
| |||
| Re: Mickelslam Quote:
Yeah but none of the "young" players have really stepped up and challenged Tiger. (Can't see calling Phil, Retief, Vijay being called Young) Not sure if it is too much money and too good a life style or what but the so called young phenoms have been less then impressive in the majors and even on tour. Will see if they have no fear of Tiger or Phil when they have a one shot lead in a major, too me since Tiger turned 30 none of the 20 somethings looked even a remote possibility to even challenge in the a major let alone be there in every major the way the big 5 usually are. Bob |
| |||
| Re: Mickelslam They can all hit every shot in the book... the difference is that Tiger has an awsome mental game.. how many times have we seen him come back from being a quite a few shots behind. I think one of his stats was that he hadnt missed a putt from a metre in almost two yrs. I can putt 9/10 on the practice green... put me on the course and youll see me three put once or twice, obviously im no where near there level but the mental game is such a big factor. Tiger knows how to win, simple as that. (wish it was that simple for me...lol ) |
| |||
| Re: Mickelslam I think proclaiming Phil as “The Man” and Tiger as over or even #2, is somewhat naive and premature. And I’m not sold on Phil’s success being due to the dual driver approach. He’s currently hitting some darn good iron shots and putting extremely well. However let’s see how long he can keep this momentum. As for Tiger, consider this. I don’t remember the last time I saw him drive the ball well for four rounds, yet his short game and mental approach are so solid, he’s in every major and winning many of them. He’s simply not a good driver of the ball other than his length. But he working on fixing it and if he does, Katie bar the door cuz he’ll blow the record books and Phil away. King Rat |
| ||||
| Re: Mickelslam Tiger is still number 1, no question bout that, but I think Phil will establish himself as the most likely contender now. Tigers mental gifts are his biggest advantage, for sure, but I would say that Faldo and Langer still have the match of him there but as Faldo himself said 'I just dont have the guns anymore'. Tigers ability to save scores by holing half a dozen 10 footers is waning. A telling stat is that he has NEVER come from behind to win a Major and he has never finished second. Tiger used to be one of the best drivers on tour but no more, I worry that he still suffers from a rather juvenile need to prove his power every time he steps up to a ball. No matter what anyone says his swing looks pretty nasty now compared to when he first joined the tour there looks to be a lot of moving parts for a swing that moves so quickly. Can you picture Tigers short game and mental game in Couples swing? hmmmmmm D
__________________ Longniddry Golf Club Champ 2005. In the Taylor Made Bag: Titleist 905T 8.5 Degree Callaway Steelhead 3 Wood Callaway Steelhead 5 Wood Callaway X-16 3-PW MacGregor Tourney 52 Degree Cobra Phil Rodgers 59 Degree Rusty Odyssey DFX 2-Ball Callaway Tour iX |